Some people believe that animals should be treated in the
same way humans are and have similar rights, whereas others think that it is
more important to use them as we desire for food and medical research. This
essay will discuss both points of view.
With regard to the exploitation of
animals, people believe it is acceptable for several reasons. Firstly, they
think that humans are the most important beings on the planet, and everything
must be done to ensure human survival. If this means experimenting on animals
so that we can fight and find cures for diseases, then this takes priority over
animal suffering. Furthermore, it is believed by some that animals do not feel
pain or loss as humans do, so if we have to kill animals for food or other
uses, then this is morally acceptable.
However, I do not believe these arguments
stand up to scrutiny. To begin, it has been shown on numerous occasions by
secret filming in laboratories via animal rights groups that animals feel as
much pain as humans do, and they suffer when they are kept in cages for long
periods. In addition, a substantial amount of animal research is done for
cosmetics, not to find cures for diseases, so this is unnecessary. Finally, it
has also been proven that humans can get all the nutrients and vitamins that
they need from green vegetables and fruit. Therefore, again, having to kill
animals for food is not an adequate argument.
To sum up, although some people argue
killing animals for research and food is ethical, I would argue there is
sufficient evidence to demonstrate that this is not the case, and, therefore,
steps must be taken to improve the rights of animals.
0 comments